Entry #72

Overwatch Leavers Deserve Harsh Penalties

2017-06-16 18:20:29 by KupaMan


As Overwatch’s place in the competitive scene grows, so too does its share of players abusing and manipulating their way to the top. Whether it’s gaming MMR or boosting Skill Rating, some players would rather cheat their way to more CP than earn it through legitimate competition. Blizzard has been responsive in addressing these problems by increasing penalties, adding better tools for reporting offenders, and developing strategies that prevent the abuse from happening altogether. Players have welcomed the changes, and Blizzard has welcomed suggestions to refine their approach. Unfortunately, the community’s reaction hasn’t been quite as unanimous with regards to Blizzard’s stance on leavers.


In a post on the official forum, Overwatch Game Director Jeff Kaplan made some players salty when he shared his feelings on the problem:


"Our philosophy has been that we would rather not have leavers playing the game at all (especially in Competitive Play). We keep increasing the penalty for leaving and will continue to do so."


Some have pushed back, suggesting it’s unfair to punish players for something that could be outside their control. Well, guess what? They’re wrong.




The leaver problem in Overwatch is an interesting one, because unlike boosting or throwing, leaving isn’t necessarily malicious or intentional. Sure, some players are rage quitting or trolling and deserve to be punished, but when players are disconnected through no fault of their own, it can seem unfair to lump that person in with the rest. However, this ignores the bigger problem of dropping out of the game – how it screws over everybody else.


"When someone leaves, Overwatch is less fun to play for everyone." -- Scott Mercer, Principal Designer

See, you don’t have to be participating in bad behavior to be a bad teammate. Whether you leave intentionally or not, it still affects your team and the match as a whole in the same way. Overwatch is a team game first and foremost, and being an unreliable player in a team game is just as damaging as an abuser or manipulator. Those penalties leveled against leavers aren’t just to punish the player – it’s to insulate other players from them.

In another thread, Kaplan discussed this issue with PSN player World_War_Kush, upset over being temporarily banned for chronic disconnection:


We're really sorry you had a bad experience due to a disconnect … Unfortunately, we're in a really tricky spot with Competitive Play in regards to players leaving matches … There is no reliable way that we can discern if you disconnected because of a connection issue, or you forced a disconnect. Because of that, we need to treat anyone who leaves a match in the same way.

No need to apologize, Jeff.

While Kaplan argues that they have to treat all disconnects the same because they can’t discern between an intentional or unintentional one, the truth is really that it doesn’t matter. The outcome is the same, and the damage is done. When a player drops out of a match, their entire team suffers. Punishing players who are responsible for that – for any reason – is better for everybody else.

The pushback against these policies underscores a big problem not just in Competitive Overwatch, but team gaming as a whole: selfish teammates. It takes a particularly narcissistic player to assume that they deserve to play competitively on a team, even if their connection is unstable and could cost a victory – not to mention SR – of five other players. The type of player that puts their own desires ahead of the needs of their team don’t deserve to be playing a team game in the first place, and Blizzard doesn’t owe it to them to screw everybody else over in the process.

I think Wraith-12206 said it best:

"If your internet isn't reliable, you shouldn't be playing comp."


So, to Blizzard and their continued efforts to stamp out this issue, I say good luck. Until then, stick with players you know and trust. Assemble a team of people you can count on, and don’t tolerate the self-serving players that care more about their own rankings than supporting their team. And if you are one of those players, get your shit together or stick to Quick Play. You shouldn’t be playing Comp.


You must be logged in to comment on this post.


2017-06-16 23:12:26

I think it's horrible to treat people badly just because they can't afford a better connection.
Games are meant to be enjoyed, and the "get better internet or get out" attitude is extremely toxic.
The community will become a sewer.
P.S. I don't play overwatch, I just don't like this type of discriminating behaviour.
P.P.S. People who leave matches on purpose for cheating are scum. We can at least agree on that.

KupaMan responds:

Like I said above -- it's not about punishing people for having bad internet connection, it's about preventing other players from being impacted by them.

Look, if you have a bad internet connection that consistently lags you out of games, why it is fair that 11 other people have to be screwed over by it? If you drop out, EVERYBODY suffers. What's horrible is having 5 out of 6 players on a team get screwed over and negatively impacting their ranked standing by a chronic leaver and Blizzard doing nothing about it.

Everybody has had internet problems that have dropped them once or twice. It sucks. Nobody wants it to happen, and nobody wants to fuck their team like that. But, if it happens to you regularly, you're a bad, unreliable teammate, and a selfish one to boot. Blizzard has determined that you're too destructive to the match, and not worth everyone else's suffering. If you don't see that, you deserve to be removed from competitive play.


2017-06-16 23:31:16

Esports is jock culture for dweebs, and competitive modes in games are great because they get mouthy punks out of my fun zone. When people take video gaming seriously, everyone loses.


2017-06-17 04:29:07

I fully agree with their policies and find it refreshing that somebody has done something about it. Imagine how pissed off any professional sports team would be if a bunch of their players had narcolepsy. All of a sudden the guy ready to make the winning goal is now asleep and cost them the match. But don't be mad because he's playing with a serious condition that should disqualify him.

But whoa there! That just makes sense and I need to quit calling out the double standards!

KupaMan responds:

Exactly. People are way too self-serving to understand this. They see it as an attack against their ability to play competitively. They don't get that they're gambling everybody else's chances of victory because they want to try.

Nobody blames you for having a connection drop -- it happens. But if you know it could happen, and you have a history of it happening, you're putting yourself before the rest of the players. I love your narcolepsy analogy. Nobody is blaming you for having narcolepsy, but if you know you have this problem, and you know it could strike at any time, maybe you shouldn't be driving a school bus, for instance.